The competitor probe is on-chain
Titties won the launchpad war.
The trail starts with Stacc’s devnet pump-v2-amm, passes through Dylan’s devnet tester, PUMP’s mainnet Token-2022 experiments, a one-person Squads treasury and a provisioned burner—then ends with titty / TEST on LetsBonk at the apex of LetsBonk’s lead.
description: titties
The sequence
Stacc deploys pump-v2-amm on devnet
7ihN signs the deployment of GuA9. The executable binary identifies itself as programs/pump-v2-amm; 7ihN remains its upgrade authority.
Dylan’s 745x wallet tests Stacc’s AMM
745x and GuA9 share 15 transactions. One succeeds: 745x signs GuA9’s Create instruction on May 14. The surrounding failures show active integration debugging.
LetsBonk launches
BONK and Raydium open a direct Pump.fun competitor on LaunchLab.
Contemporaneous reportneveruseme mints the hooked PUMP test supply
5ph / neveruseme signs the mint of one trillion Eymp PUMP tokens, then signs their transfer into the bravo-whisky Squads vault. The same day, 745x is referenced as owner of a zero-balance Eymp Token-2022 account.
Squads provisions the future LetsBonk burner
8xwk signs a 1-of-1 Squads execution transferring 37,723,337,250 Eymp tokens from 3Gkz to an ATA owned by 8oqr. Transfer hook 9Ypq executes.
LetsBonk first flips Pump
LetsBonk leads daily launches, graduations and volume for the first time.
Market reportThe displacement peaks
Reported 24-hour launchpad share: LetsBonk 83.5%, Pump.fun 7.94%.
Reported snapshot“titty” / TEST launches through LetsBonk
The same 8oqr wallet signs a LaunchLab initialization for a one-billion-supply token: name “titty,” ticker “test,” description “titties.”
Pump retakes the daily launch count
Pump records 13,690 launches against LetsBonk’s 13,392. LetsBonk still leads daily trading volume.
Market reportThe reversal becomes a rout
Pump reaches roughly 90% of graduated-token share while LetsBonk falls near 3%. Reporting points to bot deployers switching back and aggressive PUMP buybacks.
RetrospectiveThe evidentiary ladder
| Claim | Evidence | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Stacc deployed the AMM | May 13, 2024: 7ihN signs deployment of GuA9; its binary embeds programs/pump-v2-amm, and 7ihN is upgrade authority. | Proven |
| Dylan’s devnet identity used it | May 14–15: 745x and GuA9 overlap in 15 transactions; 745x signs a successful Create. | On-chain use; identity supplied by source |
745x bridges into mainnet testing | June 19, 2025: 745x is the owner field for an Eymp Token-2022 ATA initialized in the hook experiment. It is readonly and does not sign that transaction. | Cluster link, not same-key proof |
| neveruseme creates the Eymp supply | 5ph signs the one-trillion-token Eymp mint and signs the entire transfer into 3Gkz. Pump’s profile API names 5ph “neveruseme.” | On-chain acts; identity supplied by source |
The PUMP cluster selected 8oqr | On June 19, 8xwk signed a 1-of-1 Squads execution sending 37.723B Eymp tokens to 8oqr; the custom PUMP transfer hook executed. | Proven |
8oqr launched the competitor test | On August 5, 8oqr signed LaunchLab initialization for mint 3icj…bonk with titty / test / titties metadata. | Proven |
| It was an active burner, not passive dust | The wallet has 28 mainnet and 34 devnet transactions. It was initially funded with 8 SOL by GqB1…3Pad. | Proven |
| The operation is Dylan-linked | The wallet was deliberately provisioned by the PUMP experimental treasury during the period identified by the source as a two-developer operation. | Strong, not key-level proof |
| The probe caused Pump’s comeback | Temporal adjacency: TEST on August 5; daily launch-count flip on August 6. | Unproven |
What the chain says
This was not a random retail launch found through a dust-holder list. Stacc’s 7ihN deployed the devnet AMM; Dylan’s 745x signed its Create path the following day.
A year later, 745x reappeared as a user identity in the same Eymp experiment that 5ph / neveruseme minted and moved into Squads. Squads then deliberately allocated 37.723 billion Eymp tokens to 8oqr. Six weeks later, 8oqr used LetsBonk’s production launch path.
What the chain cannot say
It cannot show who physically held the key, what they observed, whether findings were communicated to Pump, or which product, incentive, liquidity or routing decision followed.
It also cannot prove Dylan controlled 8xwk or 8oqr. The report distinguishes user-supplied identity claims for 745x and 5ph from the on-chain acts those addresses performed.
Reproducibility ledger
- Stacc deployer
7ihN8QaTfNoDTRTQGULCzbUT3PHwPDTu5Brcu4iT2paP- Stacc pump-v2-amm
GuA9pdtCqntcxCCWr2W8WbD7YdN7RDCni1JrFbzibENg- Dylan devnet tester
745xaCXLN2C4Xd7iD4BzPFmo8gypECV2A9ihxDGHAsgj- neveruseme wallet
5phHASve5KWtBayLmTMubvzin58WAUpUZLmk8UEUcW6Z- Squads config
A16s3wi1jP5Xgee3PnCyoQCh2zAwT9pFYNTTP4okeJSz- Sole member / signer
8xwk4kFKkisnQ1CJAufgryezQ2D8wNhXKZT3mQ44vm1g- Vault 0
3Gkz7CZj5ugSEkXADh9FkTKGXxcyriB5zsJUkEHfRQVF- Recipient / creator
8oqrT3xuiBnGdgvza3rg7zD727DTtmubRknSQwYyyMdX- PUMP test mint
EympvR3t6teXddQRi1BEd2eXz39q93LoEDbXNE6BAX12- Transfer hook
9YpqWRUVcFpH9jsJ8Ev67a91M92VzrXiZiBC29u8YKcm- titty / TEST mint
3icjCdv74RTXnvwpdGg8YaLdQeXBkSXoXfCwjan5bonk
The record starts with Stacc’s devnet AMM, follows Dylan’s tester into the mainnet PUMP hook experiments, crosses a one-person Squads treasury into a purposefully provisioned burner, and ends inside LetsBonk with “titty” / TEST. Pump retook the daily launch count roughly one day later. The full operational trail is documented; the playbook between probe and reversal remains missing.